Teks ucapan Belanjawan Bajet 2010 oleh YB Wee Choo Keong,
Ahli Parlimen Wangsa Maju pada Oktober 2010
Datuk Yang DiPertua
Saya mengucapkan terima kasih kerana diberi peluang untuk mengambil bahagian untuk membahas Rang Undang2 Pembekalan 2011 YAB PM bertemakan Bajet 2011
Dear YB, Way to go! I hope you will have the strength and stamina to maintain a check on our system.
I am campaigning for you in the re-election even though I am not in your area.
Thank you from NurAshikin & family.
keep up the good work of providing check and balance to the government of the day….
bungkus!
Kalau boleh YB…tolong bangkitkan kualiti perkhidmatan broadband Celcom….sangat lembab dan nyata sekali menipu pengguna….tolonglah…dah tak tahu nak cakap dekat mana lagi.
YB,
I am in your constituency. Rest assured, you will get my vote in the next PRU. Why cant we clone more MPs like you in our Dewan Rakyat. I hope you will stay true to your mission to serve the interest of the rakyat not individuals.
I have to raise one particular issue regarding Dewan Bandaraya particularly the longkang and street cleaning services. The contractor which get tens of millions of ringgit per month is failing in their duty.
Complaint against them is a taboo because “they” are immune or “kebal”. You may even be penalised for complaining. The longkang is getting smelly and clogged with sedimentation. Not a shadow of their workers are in sight for months if not years. And yet they continue to get paid. It is HARAM.
YB, I trust you will investigate my complaint. Be brave because the contractor has strong cable inside the Dewan and may be linked higher up. They seem to be “untouchable”.
You are my conduit of last resort to solving this longstanding misery. May you stay healthy,
Mike Harlem
I am beginning to believe that not all politicians are like my house cat..self ingratiating -always looking for the next meal and licking it’s private parts after that.
GOOD JOB. Keep highlighting the abuse . Don’t be like the other useless em pees
YB
Keep up the good work.I support U 101%.
YB, One more vote for you, Thank you for trying to make Malaysia a better place fro all.
thanks
YB Wee.. congrats for taking a strong stance to support freedom of expression…
nak minta YB baca skit pelan ekonomi Kelantan ni… OK ke… dia cakap macam bagus
Pelan Transformasi Ekonomi Kelantan
terima kasih atas tegoran. Amo mestilah kena amik tahu hal Klante kita deh>
sale sejahtera.
Wee anak dagak kelante
YB, I am surprised by the statement you made in Parliament
YB, we need people like you in our political system , whether they are malays, indians or chinese. This country is full of greedy , filthy rich, selfish and talk no action politicians. That is the reason why NEP cannot work as the rich politicians only care for their pocket and their fame while ignoring the need to help the poor. To all malay brothers, as long as the government really trying hard to help the poor, the dream of “satu malaysia, satu bangsa” can be crystalised. However, looking at this , even poor malays are being discriminate and treated unfairly. What do you think other races will think when such a noble strategy to help the poor has been twisted to the “devil”‘s advantage? I don’t mind special priviledge to poor malays but how can we accept this ? Pls help us YB
Simon, YB is rightfully bringing this to the attention of the Malaysian Government and the people of Malaysia.
There are fundamental flaws in the AES process that should be properly addressed and not swept under the carpet.
The reality is that had JPJ actually adhered to their own requirements, Robot/Commercial Circle would have been immediately disqualified for adding additional hardware for part of one of the tests, which was strictly forbidden.
Consider also, the test director requesting all parties to turn off theirfront facing flashes so as not to blind or kill a motorist…..and yet JPJ considers this appropriate to use as the basis of an assessment? How can it possibly be good for Malaysia? Why were the tests not conducted against the requirements of the specification and why were the participants not provided with the assessment so that the process is transparent and cannot be manipulated?
Whilst you nominate Redflex as a company with a credible product and history, the Supreme Court in the United States was told by a Redflex Director during questioning that it was using uncertified equipment to win contracts and for enforcing against motorists. This was on oath. How can this be accepted? You might also question why the RTA in New South Wales was forced to refund nearly one million dollars from one Redflex speed enforcement site
alone. You might also come clean and state that Redflex point to point speed systems in Victoria have been proven to have a fundamental fault and incorrect speed readings and have now been turned off and are subject to a
detailed review by the Department of Justice. Even their Directors have acknowledged the failure.
If you consider this in light of Redflex (or anyone else) using an agent for their products, how can an agent possibly manage a technical fault with the system
Simon, I am sorry to say that you are so na
YB Wee,
Saya bangga kerana telah mengundi anda sebagai MP. Sejak anda keluar dari PKR, jatidiri anda sebenar makin menyerlah. Saya harap lain kali anda bertanding sebagai wakil bebas, kerana saya akan pasti kempen utk anda.
ASTRO -PENALTY REINSTALLATION KERANA LATE PAYMNET = RM20/ – PENALTY UNTUK MENGURANGKAN/MENAMBAH SALORAN = RM10/. KIRI MAKAN KANAN PUNMKANA.
THE ROAD TRANSPORT BILL HAS NOT BEEN PASSED AND YET THOSE IDIOTS HAVE ALREADY APPROVED THE 2 COMPANIES. THIS GLARING FACT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. MACC NEEDS NOT GO FURTHER. MACC SHOULD MOVE INTO THIS DIRTY DEAL BEFORE MORE PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY.
Selamat Sejahtera YB.
Dari sudut pandangan saya yang kurang fasih didalam arena politik, Kerajaan & Pemahaman cara belanjawan di agihkan.
Saya mempunyai soalan yang hendak dikemukakan.
1. Apakah tujuan utama untuk berbelanja 1 Billion untuk komputer.
2. Adakah semua kawasan-kawasan yang menerima ‘hadiah’ ini sudah bersedia dengan infrastruktur bagi membolehkan mereka berhubung dengan dunia siber?
3. Bagaimana dengan cara ini membantu penerima menaiktaraf cara pendidikan mereka?
4. Kepada siapa ianya akan diagihkan? sekolah? institusi pengajian tinggi ataupun individu dan kenapa.
Dengan harapan kaedah ini saya berharap akan dapat kita pelajar yang lebih maju dan berdaya saing dgn mencari informasi terkini di dunia siber dan membantu mereka untuk lebih celik IT dan membantu negara menghasilkan graduan & personaliti yang lebih berdaya saing untuk menerajui negara satu hari nanti.
Saya akan cuba cari dan akan fahamlkan lebih dalam soalan-soalan kurang pemahaman saya tadi dan ingin meminta bantuan sauda-saudara blogger yang bijak pandai membantu saya mencari jawapan jika tidak keberatan.
Terima Kasih
YB Wee,
I salute YB for being very articulate on this AES project.
YB Minister must investigate the controversy surrounding the AES to show YB has accepted YAB PM