6 thoughts on “Parliament Questions Time, 29 June 2009”
I wonder why if they are not good enough for Sime Darby Group (SD terminated Fox a couple of months ago) PDRM should engage them?
Besides, there are rumours that the EPU is also considering appointing Fox as their PR Agency. Fox i sheaded by ex-NST guys with links to Khalimullah nad possibly, even Sil.
Since it involves taxpayers’ money, YB, you should ask the Govt whether such appointments by direct negotiations conform to Treasury Circulars and Govt Regulations and get the AG and/or MACC to investigate if any hanky-panky was involved!
I fully agree with you donplaypuks. I will be most surprised if Fox com is not connected to Kalimullah and SIL. If Fox is no good for Sime Darby then it cannot be good for anyone. May be PDRM was never consulted at all. You should know who was the Home Minister then.
The government and PDRm has been foxed! PDRm does not need a public relation consultant if it is performing its duties properly.
What is so special about Fox Com? I know that it has a few great personalities like Brendan Perera and a few others. I feel that what it can do other pr consultant companies can do just as well if not better and most of all at a much lower cost than of RM33,250. This sum of RM33,250 is exorbitant.
I hope that PDRM will take a closer look what is Fox Com doing and is it necessary to appoint Fox. To me, the appointment Fox Com for a period of 6 months is far too long.
PDRM should cut short the period in order to save money for the government.
What we interested is the end result. With the appoitment of Fox.Com, what do you think about the current reputation of PDRM ? is it improving ? I don’t think so. It is a waste of taxpayers’ money.
Ini mesti ada udang, disebalik batu atau ada b.t.ng ditengah kelangkang IGP. YB mesti siasat dan korek….korek…korek…..
I wonder why if they are not good enough for Sime Darby Group (SD terminated Fox a couple of months ago) PDRM should engage them?
Besides, there are rumours that the EPU is also considering appointing Fox as their PR Agency. Fox i sheaded by ex-NST guys with links to Khalimullah nad possibly, even Sil.
Since it involves taxpayers’ money, YB, you should ask the Govt whether such appointments by direct negotiations conform to Treasury Circulars and Govt Regulations and get the AG and/or MACC to investigate if any hanky-panky was involved!
I fully agree with you donplaypuks. I will be most surprised if Fox com is not connected to Kalimullah and SIL. If Fox is no good for Sime Darby then it cannot be good for anyone. May be PDRM was never consulted at all. You should know who was the Home Minister then.
The government and PDRm has been foxed! PDRm does not need a public relation consultant if it is performing its duties properly.
What is so special about Fox Com? I know that it has a few great personalities like Brendan Perera and a few others. I feel that what it can do other pr consultant companies can do just as well if not better and most of all at a much lower cost than of RM33,250. This sum of RM33,250 is exorbitant.
I hope that PDRM will take a closer look what is Fox Com doing and is it necessary to appoint Fox. To me, the appointment Fox Com for a period of 6 months is far too long.
PDRM should cut short the period in order to save money for the government.
What we interested is the end result. With the appoitment of Fox.Com, what do you think about the current reputation of PDRM ? is it improving ? I don’t think so. It is a waste of taxpayers’ money.
Ini mesti ada udang, disebalik batu atau ada b.t.ng ditengah kelangkang IGP. YB mesti siasat dan korek….korek…korek…..