Pakatan Rakyat tabled motion of "vote of no confidence" against Badawi

by

BREAKING NEWS

Pakatan Rakyat had already tabled a motion to move the House under Standing Order 18 (1) of Parliament to adjourn the House for the purpose of discussing a matter of public importance that is: A Vote of No Confidence Against the PM.

The Speaker’s decision will be made known on Monday at 11:30 am after Questions Time. If the Speaker allow it then it will be tabled before the House for debate on Monday at 4.30 pm.

18 thoughts on “Pakatan Rakyat tabled motion of "vote of no confidence" against Badawi”

  3. You think can aaaa….. By logical thinking, the speaker is a goverment people… for sure he will save his a** first before thinking of what you all want…..

  6. The Speaker will have time to think of an excuse to reject this motion.

    I don’t remember any of the Speakers being reported in the newspapers of allowing any opposition’s motion.

    Dear YB Wee,
    I am sorry for not able to do any translation lately…busy with work

  7. Anyway, the BN MPs outnumber PR MPs by 60++…so the Speaker should not be afraid to disallow it…if Badawi survive this then he has more to brag to the press.

    Game on!

  8. YB, I think this motion sure tak lepas la. I agree with aurora, the speaker b4 was a bn mp, so, he will have 3 nights tossing in bed, tossing coin- to allow or not to allow.

  9. WEE, a student reported how BTN create lies and twist the truth about the opposition and the history of the country. Comments which are Anti chinese, and anti indian comparing indian with snakes. Same comment like the BN state assembly woman of perak about Malaysian Indians. All indians if u have read this do not vote for BN for the rest of your life please spread this among ur community.

    The link on this is Below

    http://www.malaysiawaves.com/2008/07/umnos-latest-psy-war-materials-ex posed.html

  11. how about a non-confidence vote on the speaker.

    read this morning the speaker say no action on Bung Mokhtar because the obscene gesture he admitted to happen 2 days ago so there is time barred.

    @#$%!!!!

    Law was changed so that IRB can chase after tax payers even after 7 years

    Courts need many many years to hear a case and judges need many many years to write a judgement so people waited for years in jail

    1 Malay man hit by car in Shah Alam highway and the Malay lady passerby waited in wain for the ambulance to turn up

    What bleeding time bar of 2 days. Then this logic is that as long as a MP committ an offence in Parliamet but not notice for 48 hours then he or she is of the hook

    Compared this 2 statistic
    1) how many opposition motion allowed vs BN motion allowed
    2) how many opposition MPs suspended vs BN MPs suspended

    World class parliament? I am going to buy a plane ticket to see that!

  13. Yap Chong Yee,
    5a Prinsep Road,
    Attadale, W. Australia,
    Date : 10th July, 2008
    To,
    Editor,
    Malaysiakini.com.my

    Dear Sir,

    Re :KL High Court Originating Petition No. : D2-26-41-2001
    Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & 5 others.

    In the present climate of political upheaval in Malaysia and the most vociferous call by the people of Malaysia for reforms to be made to the judiciary of Malaysia I call on the brave media to participate in the activism of Malaysian bloggers to force reforms to be made by the weight of public pressure. If such influential web newspaper like the Malaysiakini will not support the people

  14. I dun think the Speaker will allow that… just judge from the way he says in yesterday’s news.

    This moronic, idiotic Pandikar does not know what is his function and duties in Parliament other than submit to those UMNO dogs.

    His reasoning to shoot down this motion : Pak Lah already proposed a timeframe to step down and accepted by UMNO, so no need a motion. Also, this matter is not of public interest.

  15. I’m a lil confused here so maybe someone well aware of the system can help shed some light here.
    Pak Lah says he will step down by 2010 in todays papers and his successor will be Najib.Question is,shouldn’t the next PM be elected via a voting system by all parties/people/rakyat or some sort?
    If this was the case where one can just hand pick his successor,then is this a democratic practice? If this is the case then we will never see any other preferred/capable candidate take the position of PM since the existing PM can just choose whoever he so likes and on and on etc.
    Very confused at the moment by this.

  16. Some say it is a waste of time , obviously they forgotten that PR have a good 50% voters backing it.
    Half of the voters rejected bn and voters like me keeps on pestering the MP of my constituency to bring the motion of no confidence .
    Dont lay the blame to PakatanRakyat , as we the voters dictates what PR should do and must do.
    The way i see it , the current PM and his current deputy is only valid for half of Malaysia.

  18. Hi people,

    It is easy to answer to TG’s query – if the transition happens to take place before the next election (general or party election), then the next PM can be chosen by the existing PM – look what happened when Tun Dr M stepped down.

    Democracy can take place i.e. before the party election in November (in UMNO’s case) – provided somebody challenges Pak Lah or Najib (in this case, yes, there will be competition for the top post).

    Democracy has always been there and is still existing – it is the people that fail to practice/exercise it. In this case, if people strongly are against the idea of a chosen successor, they should act against it in a proper manner, after all, action speaks louder than words.

    Adios…..

Comments are closed.